It can be seen that lawmakers also drift, determined
As early as last December, the national people's Congress at the same time the "education law" (law on education, higher education and private education promotion law) Amendment Bill shall be examined. The results of education and higher education law amendment passed, and Foundation law is pending.
What card? Stuck on the educational qualifications of the private school. In June this year, the promotion of Democratic amendments to the law on the third instance was delayed amid talk of three formally submitted the draft at the end of August, again bounced. Until yesterday, was only officially submitted three manuscripts.
Such entanglements, for each game. Draft ne bis in idem provision, private schools, the Organizer, you can choose to set up a non-profit or for-profit private schools. Three manuscripts, painting mutation, specifically that compulsory, prohibit profit-making private schools to participate.
2015 published according to Ministry of education national education statistics bulletin, 2015, there are all kinds of 162,700 in private schools, students up to 45.7042 million people. Among them, the private education in pre-primary and higher education is high, but also compulsory private schools accounted for almost 10%, due to the enormous, three manuscripts of the policy change did involve a lot of people.
Of course, no matter what time, amendment of the law is a serious matter and need to be fully considered all the circumstances, the views of the parties, drags on for a long time is not a bad thing, but the three manuscripts flip attitude, apparently has been a powerful influence.
This repayment, fear of people first and ignoring the other
Carefully study the difference of three peer reviewers and peer reviewers, you can find the following different: 1, compulsory, prohibit profit-making private schools; 2, remove two manuscripts out of private schools, reasonable compensation and transitional provisions.
Both of these changes are very strong, showing a sharp attitude. Not only to do, but after the abolition of compensation has gone. Where you can see that the basic ideas of the three manuscripts: see private schools as an evil, profit-making private schools as a heinous crime.
Why is this policy only, ignoring the other? With the removal compensation package, forcing part of the profit-making private schools were forced to change into a non-profit, but their original motives still exists, continue to demand return of capital, which led to the obvious reality of non profit profit in real terms, breeding was not chaos and rent, eventually forming the Government, non-government schools, students lose the three-party situation.
And network about limit card limit policy hair tie, the expulsion of non-governmental schools, may also catch the upgraded version of the policy. And cooperation in key areas: in October, the Shanghai Bureau of sudden scrutiny of private schools, "early admission" and "international course formed into" "moratorium on the approval of foreign private schools" ... ...
Of course, this claim is to "put themselves in private education is not standard." Taizhou city, Jiangsu Province, Deputy Secretary of education, private education developed rapidly in our country, but because of the system is not perfect, government regulation of the private school, so can't be safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of consumers. Now completely driven for-profit private schools, is for the consumer to consider, is beneficial to the cause of education.
It can be predicted that if the Foundation Act to amend three manuscripts were unfortunately passed, will hit the stage of compulsory education schools, will have a number of legitimate operators opted out. In this way, that have little hope in some areas of public schools on the outsiders, will go on as long as the money does not hope to see all other conditions of for-profit private schools, they may take their children away.
Even from the practical effects, people wish did not come true, must also show determination to try.
Has been implementing classified management, is a very good strategy, change back, but back
"Select profit early death, selected non-profit late death, sooner or later die. "Private education sector was desperate.
But by August 2015, their concerns do not exist. In accordance with the revision of the Foundation law, private education is undertaking but a gaping hole in the specific provision that allows private schools receive a reasonable return from the running balance. Note that this "return" is the name of "rewarding", not "profit". But no matter what is the name, at least as far as policy is allowed.
For a long time, local government classification management of civilian-run education into for-profit and non-profit non-governmental private education education in two. For the former, no subsidies; the latter, financial subsidies. This idea is correct, even the Foundation Act to amend the second peer review, this category management thinking continues: non-profit-making private schools, enjoy equal tax breaks with the public schools, new, expanded nonprofit private schools, Government concessions in public welfare undertakings. Profit-making private schools without any concessions.
That's right, this is Government power to fulfil or should be the farthest distance. Are public biological, the nonprofit is run by the adopted son, profit is run by passers-by. Non-profit private, Government does not have any help, no bashing, capable of developing into what all by themselves.
In this mode, the profit-making private schools are to become self-reliant, there are two extremes that makes private schools, at one extreme, private school with a good reputation, to attract outstanding faculty to charge higher, better and better; the other extreme, poor conditions of running private schools into enrollment and financial dilemma of an unsustainable situation. Due to this "polarization" to blame private property, but this market is not a profit-making private schools to determine the proper meaning of it?
People fear most in the world is not fair and especially unfair education
Opposition to three peer reviewers must be moved out of the newly revised law on compulsory education. Two points: first, as long as the People's Republic of China nationality, the right to have equal access to compulsory education; second, that mobile to have an obligation to provide compulsory education for their children.
Whether in a private school or public school, as long as the learning at the compulsory education stage, should be compulsory. If you do not acknowledge this, that priority rights of public school students, private school students ' rights will be delayed, then no need to talk about anything.
The irony is, some experts and scholars carried the banner of the compulsory education Act supports three manuscripts. In their view, the clear provisions of the law on compulsory education and compulsory education is free of charge (article II of the compulsory education Act) and, therefore, with profit-making nature of private schools is in conflict.
This understanding is quite mechanical and intentional. Reason: 1, compulsory education is free, not the nature of compulsory education. Its essential attribute is mandatory. Prior to 2006, we are also compulsory, but for a fee, until 2008 implementation of free and compulsory education in urban and rural General. From a global point of view, many countries began to implement compulsory education fees, then the progressive introduction of free policy. So, in terms of implementation time or from the fact of compulsory education, the nature of compulsory education is compulsory, free is not a necessary prerequisite.
2, even in private schools are non-profit, also must be free of charge. Wuhua, Zhejiang University College of education professor says, "has the potential to profit-making private schools charge higher, but may, in turn, fees and charges and profit non for profit is not necessarily linked. "For individuals, since the choice of private schools, are prepared to pay, the key is to price match.
Even from the perspective of the Government as it only allows the establishment of non-profit private schools would make compulsory supply of private schools, which means that the Government needs to spend more money, to provide compulsory education provided by civil, this is trouble, Tim burden yourself.
So, from a government perspective, operators, students, three, three manuscripts strangled in the compulsory education stage practices of the private school, are worthy of repeated caution!
As early as last December, the national people's Congress at the same time the "education law" (law on education, higher education and private education promotion law) Amendment Bill shall be examined. The results of education and higher education law amendment passed, and Foundation law is pending.
What card? Stuck on the educational qualifications of the private school. In June this year, the promotion of Democratic amendments to the law on the third instance was delayed amid talk of three formally submitted the draft at the end of August, again bounced. Until yesterday, was only officially submitted three manuscripts.
Such entanglements, for each game. Draft ne bis in idem provision, private schools, the Organizer, you can choose to set up a non-profit or for-profit private schools. Three manuscripts, painting mutation, specifically that compulsory, prohibit profit-making private schools to participate.
2015 published according to Ministry of education national education statistics bulletin, 2015, there are all kinds of 162,700 in private schools, students up to 45.7042 million people. Among them, the private education in pre-primary and higher education is high, but also compulsory private schools accounted for almost 10%, due to the enormous, three manuscripts of the policy change did involve a lot of people.
Of course, no matter what time, amendment of the law is a serious matter and need to be fully considered all the circumstances, the views of the parties, drags on for a long time is not a bad thing, but the three manuscripts flip attitude, apparently has been a powerful influence.
This repayment, fear of people first and ignoring the other
Carefully study the difference of three peer reviewers and peer reviewers, you can find the following different: 1, compulsory, prohibit profit-making private schools; 2, remove two manuscripts out of private schools, reasonable compensation and transitional provisions.
Both of these changes are very strong, showing a sharp attitude. Not only to do, but after the abolition of compensation has gone. Where you can see that the basic ideas of the three manuscripts: see private schools as an evil, profit-making private schools as a heinous crime.
Why is this policy only, ignoring the other? With the removal compensation package, forcing part of the profit-making private schools were forced to change into a non-profit, but their original motives still exists, continue to demand return of capital, which led to the obvious reality of non profit profit in real terms, breeding was not chaos and rent, eventually forming the Government, non-government schools, students lose the three-party situation.
And network about limit card limit policy hair tie, the expulsion of non-governmental schools, may also catch the upgraded version of the policy. And cooperation in key areas: in October, the Shanghai Bureau of sudden scrutiny of private schools, "early admission" and "international course formed into" "moratorium on the approval of foreign private schools" ... ...
Of course, this claim is to "put themselves in private education is not standard." Taizhou city, Jiangsu Province, Deputy Secretary of education, private education developed rapidly in our country, but because of the system is not perfect, government regulation of the private school, so can't be safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of consumers. Now completely driven for-profit private schools, is for the consumer to consider, is beneficial to the cause of education.
It can be predicted that if the Foundation Act to amend three manuscripts were unfortunately passed, will hit the stage of compulsory education schools, will have a number of legitimate operators opted out. In this way, that have little hope in some areas of public schools on the outsiders, will go on as long as the money does not hope to see all other conditions of for-profit private schools, they may take their children away.
Even from the practical effects, people wish did not come true, must also show determination to try.
Has been implementing classified management, is a very good strategy, change back, but back
"Select profit early death, selected non-profit late death, sooner or later die. "Private education sector was desperate.
But by August 2015, their concerns do not exist. In accordance with the revision of the Foundation law, private education is undertaking but a gaping hole in the specific provision that allows private schools receive a reasonable return from the running balance. Note that this "return" is the name of "rewarding", not "profit". But no matter what is the name, at least as far as policy is allowed.
For a long time, local government classification management of civilian-run education into for-profit and non-profit non-governmental private education education in two. For the former, no subsidies; the latter, financial subsidies. This idea is correct, even the Foundation Act to amend the second peer review, this category management thinking continues: non-profit-making private schools, enjoy equal tax breaks with the public schools, new, expanded nonprofit private schools, Government concessions in public welfare undertakings. Profit-making private schools without any concessions.
That's right, this is Government power to fulfil or should be the farthest distance. Are public biological, the nonprofit is run by the adopted son, profit is run by passers-by. Non-profit private, Government does not have any help, no bashing, capable of developing into what all by themselves.
In this mode, the profit-making private schools are to become self-reliant, there are two extremes that makes private schools, at one extreme, private school with a good reputation, to attract outstanding faculty to charge higher, better and better; the other extreme, poor conditions of running private schools into enrollment and financial dilemma of an unsustainable situation. Due to this "polarization" to blame private property, but this market is not a profit-making private schools to determine the proper meaning of it?
People fear most in the world is not fair and especially unfair education
Opposition to three peer reviewers must be moved out of the newly revised law on compulsory education. Two points: first, as long as the People's Republic of China nationality, the right to have equal access to compulsory education; second, that mobile to have an obligation to provide compulsory education for their children.
Whether in a private school or public school, as long as the learning at the compulsory education stage, should be compulsory. If you do not acknowledge this, that priority rights of public school students, private school students ' rights will be delayed, then no need to talk about anything.
The irony is, some experts and scholars carried the banner of the compulsory education Act supports three manuscripts. In their view, the clear provisions of the law on compulsory education and compulsory education is free of charge (article II of the compulsory education Act) and, therefore, with profit-making nature of private schools is in conflict.
This understanding is quite mechanical and intentional. Reason: 1, compulsory education is free, not the nature of compulsory education. Its essential attribute is mandatory. Prior to 2006, we are also compulsory, but for a fee, until 2008 implementation of free and compulsory education in urban and rural General. From a global point of view, many countries began to implement compulsory education fees, then the progressive introduction of free policy. So, in terms of implementation time or from the fact of compulsory education, the nature of compulsory education is compulsory, free is not a necessary prerequisite.
2, even in private schools are non-profit, also must be free of charge. Wuhua, Zhejiang University College of education professor says, "has the potential to profit-making private schools charge higher, but may, in turn, fees and charges and profit non for profit is not necessarily linked. "For individuals, since the choice of private schools, are prepared to pay, the key is to price match.
Even from the perspective of the Government as it only allows the establishment of non-profit private schools would make compulsory supply of private schools, which means that the Government needs to spend more money, to provide compulsory education provided by civil, this is trouble, Tim burden yourself.
So, from a government perspective, operators, students, three, three manuscripts strangled in the compulsory education stage practices of the private school, are worthy of repeated caution!
No comments:
Post a Comment